Useful and original
We create content to answer a defined learner or teacher need. Articles should add practical context, explanation or examples rather than simply restating another source.
Editorial standards
Cambridge Veritas Editorial Policy
Our educational content is designed to be useful, transparent and responsible. This page explains how we commission, review, update and correct articles about TESOL, English teaching and professional learning.
Last reviewed: 6 October 2026
Reviewed for subject accuracy
Teacher-training content may be reviewed by a named teacher educator or subject specialist. The reviewer and review date are displayed when that review has taken place.
Clear about evidence
Where an article relies on external research, standards or regulatory information, editors are expected to identify suitable primary or authoritative references and avoid unsupported guarantees.
Maintained over time
We review time-sensitive guidance when programmes, requirements, research or professional practice changes. Material updates are reflected in the visible review date.
Authors, editors and reviewers
Articles identify the responsible editorial team and, where applicable, a named subject reviewer. Contributor credentials should be relevant to the topic. Organisational authorship is used when a piece is produced collaboratively and no single byline accurately represents the work.
Sources and commercial independence
Educational guidance may link to Cambridge Veritas programmes when the programme is a relevant next step. Those links do not change the standard applied to the article. We distinguish general information from programme details, avoid presenting marketing claims as independent evidence, and do not promise search rankings, employment or professional outcomes.
Use of assisted tools
Editors may use software-assisted research, drafting or quality checks. A human editor remains responsible for relevance, accuracy, originality, tone and publication. Sensitive claims, quotations, course facts and time-dependent information require human verification before publication.
Corrections and feedback
When a substantive error is confirmed, we correct the article and update its review date. Minor spelling or formatting changes may be made without a correction note. To report an issue, include the article URL, the statement in question and a reliable supporting source.
Request a correctionExplore reviewed teacher-development guidance
Browse certification, methodology, assessment and teaching-practice resources.