Voice & Accent Certification — Intro Class Tonight
06
HRS
:
32
MIN
:
00
SEC
JOIN NOW
Cambridge Veritas

UNIT 03 / Linear Inequalities

Compound Inequalities

Solve an AND statement by applying the same operation to all three parts. This extends the required one-variable inequality work.

5 worked examples 4 questions + written practice Course foundationsGo to practice
In this lesson · jump to a section

By · Algebra I learning resources

Introduction

Compound Inequalities helps you connect a mathematical rule to a result you can explain and check. Solve an AND statement by applying the same operation to all three parts. This extends the required one-variable inequality work. This lesson belongs to linear inequalities and builds toward independent Algebra I problem solving.

Prerequisite / enrichment · supports course preparation

Alignment uses 19 TAC §111.39(c). Review lessons sample their listed standards. Readiness and supporting labels describe STAAR emphasis, not whether a topic is required.

Learning objectives

  • Identify the quantities and representations used in compound inequalities.
  • Apply the lesson's rule to solve a numerical or contextual problem.
  • Explain each mathematical step using the correct vocabulary.
  • Verify an answer and correct a likely error.

Prerequisite knowledge

Solve equations and compare signed numbers.

Previous lesson: Inequalities with Variables on Both Sides

Key mathematical vocabulary

variable
A letter representing an unknown or changing quantity.
solution
A value making the original conditions true.
inequality
A comparison using <, >, ≤, or ≥.
ratio
A comparison by division.
expression
A mathematical phrase representing a value.

Formulas and rules

  • a(b+c)=ab+ac
  • Equivalent expressions agree for all allowed inputs.
  • A solution satisfies every original condition.

Inequalities describe solution sets

Solve an AND statement by applying the same operation to all three parts. This extends the required one-variable inequality work.

An inequality compares quantities using <, >, ≤, or ≥. Its solution is usually a set of numbers. Adding or subtracting the same quantity on both sides preserves the comparison. Multiplying or dividing both sides by a negative number reverses the inequality.

The reversal follows from order on the number line: 2<5, but −2>−5. Isolate the variable, then represent all solutions. Use an open endpoint for a strict comparison and a closed endpoint when equality is included. For a context involving counts, restrict to whole numbers and respect nonnegative quantities.

A method you can explain

  1. Read the question and identify the known information, unknown quantities, and any domain restrictions. Select a suitable representation and tool.
  2. Apply the relationship explained above. Subtract 12 from ALL three parts.
  3. Write each calculation or logical inference on a separate line. Keep units and signs visible. When two methods are possible, compare which one uses the given information most directly.
  4. Check the result in the ORIGINAL conditions, not merely the last simplified line. The left boundary makes equality, which is excluded; the right boundary is included.
  5. Interpret what the answer means. Decide whether its size, sign, and precision make sense; identify a restriction or assumption that would change the conclusion.

Five worked examples

Example 1 · Beginner

Solve 27 < x + 12 ≤ 43.

  1. Subtract 12 from ALL three parts.
  2. The left endpoint becomes 15, and the right endpoint becomes 31.
  3. The solution is the intersection 15<x≤31: open circle on the left, closed on the right.

Answer: 15 < x ≤ 31

Verify: The left boundary makes equality, which is excluded; the right boundary is included.

Avoid this mistake: Forgetting to reverse after division by a negative number.

Example 2 · Basic

Solve 27 < x + 13 ≤ 44.

  1. Subtract 13 from ALL three parts.
  2. The left endpoint becomes 14, and the right endpoint becomes 31.
  3. The solution is the intersection 14<x≤31: open circle on the left, closed on the right.

Answer: 14 < x ≤ 31

Verify: The left boundary makes equality, which is excluded; the right boundary is included.

Avoid this mistake: Using an open endpoint for ≤ or ≥.

Example 3 · Intermediate

Solve 27 < x + 14 ≤ 45.

  1. Subtract 14 from ALL three parts.
  2. The left endpoint becomes 13, and the right endpoint becomes 31.
  3. The solution is the intersection 13<x≤31: open circle on the left, closed on the right.

Answer: 13 < x ≤ 31

Verify: The left boundary makes equality, which is excluded; the right boundary is included.

Avoid this mistake: Reporting a boundary as the only solution rather than a whole set.

Example 4 · Advanced

Solve 28 < x + 2 ≤ 34.

  1. Subtract 2 from ALL three parts.
  2. The left endpoint becomes 26, and the right endpoint becomes 32.
  3. The solution is the intersection 26<x≤32: open circle on the left, closed on the right.

Answer: 26 < x ≤ 32

Verify: The left boundary makes equality, which is excluded; the right boundary is included.

Avoid this mistake: Forgetting to reverse after division by a negative number.

Example 5 · Challenge

Solve 28 < x + 3 ≤ 35.

  1. Subtract 3 from ALL three parts.
  2. The left endpoint becomes 25, and the right endpoint becomes 32.
  3. The solution is the intersection 25<x≤32: open circle on the left, closed on the right.

Answer: 25 < x ≤ 32

Verify: The left boundary makes equality, which is excluded; the right boundary is included.

Avoid this mistake: Using an open endpoint for ≤ or ≥.

Common mistakes and corrections

  • Forgetting to reverse after division by a negative number.
  • Using an open endpoint for ≤ or ≥.
  • Reporting a boundary as the only solution rather than a whole set.

Real-world applications

  1. Determine affordable ticket counts under a budget. Define the input and its units, apply the mathematical relationship, and check that the result fits the setting.
  2. Describe measurements that meet a minimum safety requirement. Define the input and its units, apply the mathematical relationship, and check that the result fits the setting.

Topic summary

Solve an AND statement by applying the same operation to all three parts. This extends the required one-variable inequality work.

An inequality compares quantities using <, >, ≤, or ≥. Its solution is usually a set of numbers. Adding or subtracting the same quantity on both sides preserves the comparison. Multiplying or dividing both sides by a negative number reverses the inequality.

Frequently asked questions

What should I know before compound inequalities?

Solve equations and compare signed numbers.

How can I check my work?

The left boundary makes equality, which is excluded; the right boundary is included. A numerical check can detect an error; when claiming an identity for all inputs, also explain the algebraic property that makes it true.

Which mistakes should I watch for?

Forgetting to reverse after division by a negative number. Using an open endpoint for ≤ or ≥. Reporting a boundary as the only solution rather than a whole set.

Can I use another valid method?

Yes. Explain your assumptions, show enough intermediate work to justify the result, and verify it in the original problem. Equivalent expressions and valid alternative methods receive credit.

Mathematical process practice · A.1A–A.1G
  • A.1A: Determine affordable ticket counts under a budget.
  • A.1B: Plan, solve, check, and interpret the written response.
  • A.1C: Select paper, a calculator, a table, or a graph; explain the choice.
  • A.1D: Connect symbols with a verbal explanation and another representation.
  • A.1E: Organize the solution with a table, diagram, or labeled equations.
  • A.1F: Explain how the representation and the algebraic rule express the same relationship.
  • A.1G: Justify each operation and the reasonableness of the conclusion.

Quick revision notes

  • Solve an AND statement by applying the same operation to all three parts. This extends the required one-variable inequality work.
  • Forgetting to reverse after division by a negative number.
  • Using an open endpoint for ≤ or ≥.
  • Reporting a boundary as the only solution rather than a whole set.
Practice for STAAR EOC ? My learning dashboard

Practice and explain

Try all four multiple-choice questions, then show your reasoning in the written response. Objective scores and AI feedback assess different skills.

Checking your practice access…

Part A: Four objective questions

Question 1

Solve 28 < x + 4 ≤ 36.

Question 2

Solve 28 < x + 5 ≤ 37.

Question 3

Solve 28 < x + 6 ≤ 38.

Question 4

Solve 28 < x + 7 ≤ 39.

Part B: Explain your reasoning

Solve 28 < x + 8 ≤ 40. Show your complete working. Define the quantities, select and explain a suitable method or tool, organize a table, diagram, or symbolic representation, and connect it to your result. Verify the result against the original conditions and explain any restrictions or contextual meaning.

concept understanding
2 marks
mathematical method
3 marks
calculation accuracy
3 marks
reasoning
2 marks

Show your steps and explain how you checked your answer.

0/8,000

Submitted work is sent to OpenAI for feedback. Please omit names and personal information.

AI feedback can make mistakes. It supports learning and is not an official grade. You can revise your work and submit again.

Your next step

Continue learning

View curriculum

Original Cambridge Veritas practice. These are not official STAAR items. Cambridge Veritas is not affiliated with or endorsed by TEA.

Official Algebra I TEKS (§111.39) · TEA assessed curriculum · STAAR blueprint · TEA instructional materials