Voice & Accent Certification — Intro Class Tonight
06
HRS
:
32
MIN
:
00
SEC
JOIN NOW
Cambridge Veritas
Writing Analyser 3 min read

AI Writing Feedback and Academic Integrity: Keep the Work Yours

Use AI feedback transparently within applicable rules, distinguishing diagnosis and revision support from generated authorship or undisclosed substitution.

By Cambridge Veritas · Published

In this guide

What you will be able to do

  • Check the actual rules
  • Keep the original response
  • Separate feedback from authorship

Check the actual rules

Institutional and assessment policies differ. Do not infer permission from the existence of a tool.

Keep the original response

A baseline helps demonstrate your independent work and understand what support changed.

Separate feedback from authorship

A comment can inform your revision without supplying a replacement response. Generated text cannot establish your unaided writing ability.

Document support where required

Follow the relevant disclosure requirements. This article does not provide a universal academic-integrity policy.

Work through an original example

A learner wants diagnostic feedback on their own practice essay, not a generated submission.

They keep the original, review suggestions and rewrite independently under the rules applicable to that setting.

Practice commentary

Why this version works

Answer: The process preserves learning evidence and avoids misrepresenting authorship.

Practise, check and try a changed task

Write down which support is permitted for your actual task before using a tool.

Keep a revision note explaining changes in your own words.

  • Check the meaning against the original task, rather than rewarding impressive wording alone.
  • Keep one concrete observation and one next action; avoid treating a single attempt as a complete assessment.

Continue with focused practice

Use the original task and your own draft when reviewing a report. Verify data, meaning and any suggested correction before revising. Check current access requirements and use fictional material rather than sensitive personal information.

Practise with Writing Analyser

Guided communication practice

Would focused feedback help your next attempt?

Use the original task and your own draft when reviewing a report. Verify data, meaning and any suggested correction before revising. Check current access requirements and use fictional material rather than sensitive personal information.

Practise with Writing Analyser

Useful answers

Frequently asked questions

Is AI use permitted everywhere?

No. Check the specific institution and task rules.

Does completing this exercise certify proficiency?

No. This is independent educational practice, not an official examination or validated proficiency judgement.

Should I accept automated feedback without checking?

No. Compare feedback with the original task and your response. Seek qualified guidance where a suggestion remains unclear.

How should I check transfer?

Try fresh material with the same skill demand. A memorised repeat can improve without demonstrating flexible use.

Sources, scope and accuracy

AI writing feedback is diagnostic guidance, not an official IELTS result or an examiner judgement. Original examples are independent educational exercises. Written by the Cambridge Veritas editorial team. No independent clinical, legal or examination review is claimed. Cambridge Veritas provides the linked programme or product.

AI Writing Feedback and Academic Integrity: Keep the Work Yours